Vikas Divyakirti criticizes ‘Animal’ for promoting regressive values, sparking debate on ethical filmmaking and societal impact in Bollywood.
Prominent educator and former IAS officer Vikas Divyakirti has expressed his displeasure of the Ranbir Kapoor-starring Bollywood flick “Animal.” His analysis clarifies the ramifications for society and the creative duty of filmmaking.
Vikas Divyakirti ‘s Disapproval
Renowned for his part in the movie “12th Fail,” as well as his significant influence as an IAS tutor and popular figure on YouTube, Vikas Divyakirti, voiced serious concerns regarding “Animal.” His criticism emphasizes the value of moral storytelling as well as the possible influence of media on sensitive minds.
The Social Regression of Film
‘Animal’ was criticized by Vikas Divyakirti in an interview with radio host Neelesh Misra for supposedly promoting backward morals. He proposed that the film’s depiction of toxic masculinity and the dehumanizing treatment of women could cause a ten-year regression in the advancement of society.
Adverse Effects on Young People
In ‘Animal,’ Vikas Divyakirti called attention to a particular moment in which Ranbir Kapoor’s character asks a woman to lick his shoe as a sign of commitment. He voiced concern that these kinds of portrayals would cause gullible people to imitate such behavior, thus maintaining negative gender dynamics.
Moral Filmmaking
Vikas Divyakirti questioned the lack of social value in “Animal” and stressed the significance of narrative with a purpose beyond commercial gain, calling attention to the responsibilities of filmmakers. He asked filmmakers to think about how their stories would affect society as a whole.
Vikas Divyakirti Part in “12th Fail”
Vikas Divyakirti’s self-playing role in the movie “12th Fail” demonstrates his dedication to social activism and education. In contrast to the derogatory depiction of masculinity in “Animal,” his persona is a source of inspiration and moral direction.
“Animal”: Box office Success vs. Moral Issues
‘Animal’ garnered ₹900 crore in global revenue, demonstrating its considerable commercial success; yet, its depiction of subjects such as infidelity and toxic masculinity was met with criticism. The film industry’s priorities are called into question when ethical considerations and financial success are placed side by side.
Reactions from Celebrities to “Animal”
A number of celebrities have voiced their opinions on the “Animal” controversy, including Vidya Balan. Critics have praised the film’s storytelling skills but expressed concern over its unreserved depiction of controversial subjects, sparking debates about social duty and creative integrity.
Affect of Celebrity Analysis
Celebrities such as Vikas Divyakirti and Vidya Balan’s reaction to the film “Animal” highlights the larger discourse in society over the moral implications of popular culture. Their criticisms support a critical examination of the duties imposed on filmmakers as well as the function of the media in forming societal norms and values.
The ongoing discussion regarding the moral implications of media representation and the ethical aspects of filmmaking is brought to light by Vikas Divyakirti’s critique of “Animal.” His analysis serves as a reminder of how movies have the ability to alter people’s perspectives and behaviours as long as discussions over moral responsibility and artistic freedom continue.