8 September 2023, Mumbai: The Bharat vs. India controversy has ignited discussions and reflections on the nation’s name, bringing forth diverse opinions and sentiments from prominent figures like actor Jackie Shroff. His recent comments during a media interaction offered a humane perspective on this complex issue.
“Jackie, Jocky, or Jaki”
Jackie Shroff’s analogy involving his own name, “Jackie, Jocky, or Jaki,” resonated with the heart of the matter. He illustrated that names may evolve or take on variations, but the essence and identity they represent remain unchanged. In doing so, he urged people not to forget their Indian identity amidst the debate about the country’s name. His words underscored a fundamental truth: while terminologies may shift, the core identity of being Indian remains constant.
G20 Summit banquet replaced “India” with “Bharat.”
The controversy initially emerged when invitations for an official G20 Summit banquet replaced “India” with “Bharat.” This substitution ignited discussions and speculations, particularly within political circles, including members of the Opposition INDIA alliance. Notably, actor Amitabh Bachchan added his voice to the debate with a tweet expressing support for “Bharat Mata Ki Jai.” His tweet seemed to align with those in favor of retaining the name “Bharat.”
Prime Minister Narendra Modi towards the name “India.”
In response, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury pointed out the perceived aversion of Prime Minister Narendra Modi towards the name “India.” He suggested that the Prime Minister’s dislike for the term had grown since opposition parties formed the INDIA alliance. Chowdhury even proposed the idea of vacating government buildings with colonial legacies, such as the Rashtrapati Bhawan and the North and South blocks, to further emphasize the complexity of the historical context.
“India” and “Bharat” as integral facets of identity.
Article 1 of the Indian Constitution provides crucial context for this debate. It states, “India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.” This constitutional provision reaffirms the nation’s dual nomenclature, recognizing both “India” and “Bharat” as integral facets of its identity. In essence, the Bharat vs. India controversy highlights the multifaceted nature of India’s identity and heritage. It calls for a nuanced understanding of the historical context and the enduring essence of being Indian. Amidst changing terminologies, the rich tapestry of India’s diverse heritage remains a constant source of pride and celebration.
Jackie Shroff’s humane perspective, coupled with the diverse viewpoints expressed throughout this debate, underscores the need to preserve and honor the nation’s cultural mosaic and historical legacy. Regardless of the terms used, the essence of being Indian endures, reminding us of the strength and unity of this great nation.
By Yashika Desai